News
'Women and Mental Illness in Post-War Britain' Workshop Summary
An in-person workshop was held on 13-14 April 2023 at the University of 糖心TV, co-organised by Fabiola Creed and Hilary Marland.
Generously funded by the Wellcome Trust, the Centre for the History of Medicine at 糖心TV and 糖心TV鈥檚 Global Research Priority Health, and prompted by our Wellcome funded project 鈥楾he Last Taboo of Motherhood鈥�, this workshop explored changes in understanding, diagnosing and responding to women鈥檚 mental illnesses in post-Second World War Britain.
Improving Maternity Care through Women鈥檚 Voices: The Women鈥檚 Health Strategy Continues a Long Process of Advocacy
Congratulations to Dr Fabiola Creed and Professor Hilary Marland for the publication of their policy paper in the online journal History & Policy.
The article explores the role of women鈥檚 voices in shaping maternity care during the twentieth century and you can .
Executive Summary
- Effective maternity care has been hampered by limited service provision and inadequate funding throughout the twentieth and into the twenty-first century.
- Pronatalist policies dominated maternity care in the first half of the twentieth century, moving to a growing consumer-led emphasis in the post-war period.
- Historical events – war, the creation of the National Health Service, the hospitalisation and medicalisation of childbirth, and the feminist health movement – led to fundamental changes in maternity services and care.
- After 1900, women became vocal in expressing their aims for improved maternity care, and their ambitions were most effective when they dovetailed with pronatalist goals.
- Following the expansion of mass media, education, and employment for women since颅 the 1960s, both women鈥檚 organisations and individuals developed greater confidence in their campaigns for change and in urging policy makers and health services to listen.
- Descriptions of their own experiences from women of all social circumstances and ethnicities can be converted into powerful tools for lobbying policy makers and government and for raising recognition of postnatal mental illness.
Pilot Programs and Postcolonial Pivots: Pioneering 鈥淒NA Fingerprinting鈥� on Britain鈥檚 Borders
Professor Roberta Bivins, CHM Director, has had an article published in Contemporary Studies in Society and History.
Developed in Britain and the United States in the 1980s, genetic profiling has since become a global technology. Today, it is widely regarded as the evidentiary 鈥済old standard鈥� in individual and forensic identification. However, its origins as a technology of post-empire at Britain鈥檚 externalized borders in South Asia have remained unexamined. This article will argue that the first state-sanctioned use of 鈥淒NA fingerprints,鈥� a pilot program exploring its value in disputed cases of family reunification migration from Bangladesh and Pakistan to Britain鈥檚 postcolonial cities, repays closer examination. National and transnational responses to the advent of genetic profiling as an identification technology demonstrate the interplay between imperial and postcolonial models and networks of power and truth production. At the same time, this experiment prefigured and conditioned the wider reception of DNA profiling in matters of kinship. Far from being a footnote, the use of genetic profiling by migrants determined to exercise their legal rights in the face of a hostile state also worked to naturalize genetic ties as the markers of 鈥渢rue鈥� familial relationships.