ÌÇÐÄTV

Skip to main content Skip to navigation

CAGE Working Papers February 2026

Header image for article

CAGE Working Papers February 2026

CAGE research papers draw on our global academic network of research associates and address topics aligned to our four core themes.

Contact cage.centre@warwick.ac.ukLink opens in a new window for more information on submitting research to our working paper series or to be added to our mailing list.

792 Social Media Advertising Loads as PricesLink opens in a new window

Authors: George Beknazar-Yuzbashev, Rafael Jiménez-Durán, Andrey Simonov, Mateusz Stalinski

Theme: Designing and Building Institutions

Summary: This paper investigates why most digital platforms rely on advertising rather than subscriptions. It proposes three mechanisms: users are more sensitive to monetary prices than ad loads, microtargeting improves ad-user match quality, and platforms can personalize ad loads to price discriminate. In a field experiment with 1,810 Facebook users, hiding ads slightly increases usage, while removing targeting reduces engagement. Simulations show ad-funded models match or exceed subscription profits and generate higher consumer surplus.

Read the working paper

791 Proximity to Fast-Food Outlets and Adolescent BMI: Accounting for Persistent Health DynamicsLink opens in a new window

Authors: Yu Aoki-Beattie, Wiji Arulampalam, Neil Lloyd, Sushil Mathew

Theme: Gender, Health and Wellbeing

Summary: This paper estimates the causal impact of fast-food outlet exposure on adolescent z-BMI using data from the UK Millennium Cohort Study. It introduces a novel method that clusters early childhood BMI trajectories to account for persistent obesity risk profiles, separating baseline susceptibility from environmental effects. Exploiting the transition from primary to secondary school as exogenous variation, the study finds that proximity to major fast-food outlets near schools significantly increases z-BMI, with effects diminishing at greater distances.

Read the working paper

790 Can hate speech be banned online? The effects of shutting down toxic forums on RedditLink opens in a new window

Authors: Adam Di Lizia, Lily Shevchenko

Theme: Designing and Building Institutions

Summary: This paper evaluates whether deplatforming reduces online toxicity by studying Reddit’s June 2020 ban of thousands of hateful forums. Using near-universe comment data and a difference-in-differences design, it finds that affected users increase overall activity and shift to new forums, with effects persisting over time. However, their comments contain 20% fewer instances of hate speech. The policy shows no negative spillovers or engagement losses, suggesting targeted moderation can reduce toxicity without undermining platform participation.

Read the working paper

789 Religion and the Wealth of Nations after 250 YearsLink opens in a new window

Authors: Sascha O. Becker

Theme: Global Economic History

Summary: This paper examines the relationship between religion and economics on the 250th anniversary of Adam Smith’s The Wealth of Nations. It revisits the religious and moral-philosophical influences on Smith’s thought, challenging the view of him as purely secular. The chapter then reviews contemporary economic research on religion’s role in shaping economic behavior and outcomes, highlighting how religious beliefs and institutions continue to influence development, preferences, and economic performance in the modern era.

Read the working paper

788 Identifying level-k reasoning in repeated games: Strategies, beliefs, and cognitive ability Link opens in a new window

Authors: David Gill, Yaroslav Rosokha

Theme: Designing and Building Institutions

Summary: This paper investigates level-k reasoning in repeated games, focusing on strategic thinking at the level of supergame strategies rather than individual rounds. It develops a model incorporating choices over strategies and beliefs about others’ strategies, and tests it using data from an Indefinitely Repeated Prisoner’s Dilemma with elicited beliefs. A substantial share of subjects exhibit level-1 or level-2 reasoning. Higher cognitive ability and experience predict more sophisticated strategic reasoning.

Read the working paper


Let us know you agree to cookies