Historiography Essay Titles
Note: the exam format for 2018 will change. There will be no longer A,B,C sections.
Also, remember that it is a 'seen' exame which means you will receive the exam questions a week in advance.
But you are still welcome to use the questions below for any formative/assessed essay.
Questions on Specific Text/Historian for Essays
- What was the impact of the Enlightenment on History-writing in Europe?
- Would James Mill have written a better history of India if he had known Indian languages?
- Describe historical thinking in colonial era India.
- Assess the significance of style in Ranke鈥檚 historical writing.
- If Ranke 鈥榬ejected Sir Walter Scott鈥, what was he rejecting?
- Was Leopold von Ranke a Romantic?
- Describe von Ranke鈥檚 鈥業deal of Universal History鈥. Discuss its relationship to the local and the universal in the historical thinking of EITHER Karl Marx OR Max Weber.
- Describe Iggers鈥 and Wang鈥檚 鈥榟istory of Leopold von Ranke in the world鈥. Account for any deficiencies in their argument.
- What did Karl Marx mean when he asserted that 鈥榯he social revolution of the nineteenth century can only create its poetry from the future, not from the past鈥? (Eighteenth Brumaire, Section 1).
- How was The Eighteenth Brumaire revisited on its 150th birthday?
- 鈥榃here Hegel started with philosophy, Marx started with people鈥檚 experiences鈥. Discuss.
- 鈥楽implicity supplies the key to the secret of the unchangeableness of Asiatic societies鈥 (Marx, Capital, Vol.1, xiv, s. 4). How typical was Marx鈥檚 historiography of India?
- Discuss the 鈥楳arxism鈥 of any twentieth-century historian or theorist of history [state the person clearly in the title].
- Why is Walter Benjamin鈥檚 鈥極n the Concept of History鈥 still regarded as an important text?
- Can Walter Benjamin鈥檚 understanding of History be described as Marxist?
- What is a 'historical fact'?
- What is class consciousness for Marx?
- Was Weber anti-Marx?
- How did Weber approach the problem of causation in history?
- What does Weber understand by rational capitalism and how does it differ from Marx's ideas?
- What does Gramsci mean by hegemony? How does it work?
- 鈥楾he science of men in time鈥 is how Marc Bloch described the practice of history. What did he mean?
- 鈥榃ith their examination of 尘别苍迟补濒颈迟茅 the Annalist historians furnished the historical profession with a new mode of reconstructing the past鈥. Discuss.
- 鈥業t is undeniable that a science [like the historical science] will always seem to us somehow incomplete if it cannot, sooner or later, in one way or another, aid us to live better鈥. (Bloch, Historian鈥檚 Craft) Discuss Bloch鈥檚 view of the historical enterprise within society.
- There are many English-language educational and media websites devoted to the work of Annales historians. Make a selection of them, and give an account of the ways in which a twentieth-century 鈥榟istorical school鈥 is presented to twenty-first century reading publics.
- The Making of the English Working Class 鈥榟as come to be seen as the single most influential work of English history of the post-war period鈥 (John Rule, DNB entry for E. P. Thompson). Why?
- Drawing on the resources of advanced options and special subjects, discuss whether or not there is still 鈥榓 Thompsonian legacy鈥 in historical studies.
- Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of micro-history.
- Discuss any historical case-study you have read. Is the case-study approach the same as the micro-historical approach?
- What was cultural about 鈥榯he New Cultural History鈥?
- Is Foucault's still disturbing for readers today as it was for readers in the 1970s and 1980s?
- What does Foucault mean by biopower?
- Is Foucault still valuable today?
- 鈥楢 challenge to the conventional Western interpretation of the non-Western world鈥. Is this an adequate description of the impact of Said鈥檚 work on historical scholarship?
- Describe 鈥榯he reception of Edward Said鈥 by historians and others.
- What – if anything – was original about Subaltern Studies?
- To what extent is it possible to hear the voice of the subalter.
- 鈥業t is now men (and masculinity) that are truly hidden from history鈥. Discuss.
- Discuss the view that Judy Walkowitz鈥檚 City of Dreadful Delight is 鈥榓bout stories, not about history鈥.
Part B-style general questions
(note: you should answer such questions comparatively, not focusing on just one historian or thinker.)
- Why study historiography?
- What is a 鈥榟istorian鈥?
- Is history a 鈥榮cience鈥?
- History is closer to literature than to science.鈥 Discuss.
- Is History primarily about the past or the present?
- What are the implications of E. H. Carr's claim that 鈥榦nly the future can provide the key to the interpretation of the past鈥?
- Is total or holistic history possible or desirable?
- Describe and discuss the historical enterprise of any one society, past or present, that you have studied during your degree course.
- What counts as a historical source?
- Is there any difference between a historical 鈥榝act鈥 and historical 鈥榚vidence鈥?
- 鈥楾he idea of what is considered 鈥渧alid historical evidence鈥 has changed considerably over the past two centuries.鈥 Discuss.
- 鈥楾he science of men in time鈥 is how Marc Bloch characterised history. What did he mean? Introduce other historians鈥 conceptions of time in answering this question.
- 鈥楾he writing of history tells us more about the historian than about the past.鈥 Do you agree?鈥
- 鈥淭ime鈥 has no agreed meaning for historians.鈥 Discuss.
- 鈥楬istory from below invariably romanticises popular culture.鈥 Discuss.
- Is history, as it is written, inevitably relativistic?
- Is it true, as George Orwell claimed, that those with power in the present control the past?
- Has history ended, as Francis Fukuyma claimed?
- Can the writing of history be politically neutral?
- Does political history have a future?
- How and why has cultural history become so important?
- 鈥楳odern history can only be conceived in relationship to the nation state鈥.鈥 Discuss.
- 鈥楽ince the early nineteenth century, historians have been engaged in a continuing debate with the heritage of the Enlightenment.鈥 Discuss.
- How should history be taught in schools?
- Why should governments fund historical research?
- What is the value of popular history? (You may answer this in terms of television history, film or drama.)
- Why has family history become so popular in modern Britain?
- Why was Marxist theory central to twentieth-century historical scholarship?
- Has the historical writing influenced by Marx been good history?
- To what extent has gender as a category of analysis changed the way historians conceptualise identity and experience?
- 鈥楬istory as a discipline has been and is highly Eurocentric.鈥 Is this true?
- 鈥楶ostcolonialism forces us to re-evaluate the whole history of Britain in modern times.鈥 Discuss.
- How important has the history of the non-Western world been to the shaping of Western historiography?
- Are postmodernist views of history plausible?
- Was postmodernism a serious 鈥榗hallenge to history鈥 in the late twentieth century?
- Has the linguistic turn produced good history writing
- Visucal and material culture is important to history writing. Discuss.
-
Neuroscience can help us to write better history. Discuss.
- Did you think the material and visual turn enrich history writing?
- 'Historians should stick to literary sources. They are the only way to access the past objectively'. Discuss.