糖心TV

Skip to main content Skip to navigation

Postgraduate "Work In Progress" Seminar

Postgraduate Work-In-Progress Seminar

A weekly seminar for Philosophy postgraduates to present their in-progress work, followed by a well-spirited trip to the pub for food and drinks.


Useful Info

The WIP provides a risk-free and supportive space for postgraduates to present their work and receive feedback from other graduates and faculty.

  • When: Every Thursday (5pm to 6:15pm)
  • Where: Room S1.50 (Social Sciences Building, First Floor)
  • What: 30-minute presentation, followed by Q&A.

Attendance optional but highly recommended. All postgraduates are welcome to present or attend -- whether MA, MPhil, PhD, Visitors, etc.


馃搮 Format


  • Presentation: 30 minutes
  • Open Discussion / Q&A: 30 minutes
  • Material: Anything, really -- assessed essay (for MAs), a supervision essay (for MPhils), or a thesis section (for PhDs), ...
  • Style: Flexible -- slides, handouts, or simply talking.
  • Audience: No prior reading or background knowledge expected. Visiting PhDs should can present.

馃 Should I present? ("I have nothing to present; I hate public speaking; etc.")


  • Are you a postgraduate? Then yes, you should present.
  • In other words, all graduates are encouraged to present at least once.
  • The WIP is a unique opportunity for graduates to develop their public speaking / writing skills, take risks, test out theses, and get constructive feedback from peers.*
  • Presentations need not (in fact, should not) be watertight or polished pieces at all. You are encouraged to present work at all stages of the writing process -- first drafts, substantial sets of notes, etc.
  • Simply signing up for a date is a great way to give yourself a deadline to work towards. (This is what most people do.)
 
NEXT TALK

Ignacio Pe帽a Caroca

(PhD)

Consent


Thursday 07/05/2026

5pm - 6:15pm

S1.50


ORGANISERS

Tiago Rodrigues

Lucas Menezes 

   

 

Show all calendar items

CRPLA Seminar: Antonia Hofst盲tter (糖心TV) 鈥 'Falling Stars, Dying Planets, and the Limits of Natural Beauty: Reflections on Adorno鈥檚 Aesthetics in the Age of the Anthropocene'

- Export as iCalendar
Location: A0.23 (Soc Sci) and on Teams

Abstract:

Adorno鈥檚 aesthetics are currently undergoing a renaissance. The reason, it seems, lies not in their potential contribution to the analyses of contemporary artworks, but in Adorno鈥檚 unorthodox rethinking of the notion of natural beauty. In their resemblance to natural beauty, 鈥榮uccessful鈥 artworks, Adorno claims, promise the end of the domination of nature. In thus providing an intellectual resource for conceptualizing non-instrumental modes of comportment toward the natural world, the appeal of 鈥榥atural beauty鈥 to contemporary scholarship is hardly surprising. Taking my cue from Adorno鈥檚 historically situated approach, however, I would like to problematize this current intellectual trend. In my paper, I will first lend substance to Adorno鈥檚 notion of natural beauty by unpacking his reading of a passage in Beethoven鈥檚 piano sonata in D minor, Op.31 No. 2, in which a falling star seems to appear on the firmament. I will then move to Adorno鈥檚 reflections on the closing bars of Mahler鈥檚 Lied von der Erde, which, I contend, register an inversion of the Beethovenian perspective. My tracing of these two distinct aesthetic and metaphysical constellations aims not only at elucidating the complex concept of natural beauty but, crucially, at drawing out the historically contingent and shifting aesthetic experiences which they presuppose. Ultimately, I will raise the question whether the aesthetic experiences that informed Adorno鈥檚 approach to art and aesthetics – and which are indebted to the experience of beauty in nature – still resonate with us today.

Teams access:

Show all calendar items

Let us know you agree to cookies