糖心TV

Skip to main content Skip to navigation

Research Seminars, Colloquia and Reading Groups

Wednesday, April 30, 2025

Select tags to filter on
Tue, Apr 29 Today Thu, May 01 Jump to any date

How do I use this calendar?

You can click on an event to display further information about it.

The toolbar above the calendar has buttons to view different events. Use the left and right arrow icons to view events in the past and future. The button inbetween returns you to today's view. The button to the right of this shows a mini-calendar to let you quickly jump to any date.

The dropdown box on the right allows you to see a different view of the calendar, such as an agenda or a termly view.

If this calendar has tags, you can use the labelled checkboxes at the top of the page to select just the tags you wish to view, and then click "Show selected". The calendar will be redisplayed with just the events related to these tags, making it easier to find what you're looking for.

 
-
Export as iCalendar
Philosophy Staff WiP Seminar
S2.77
-
Export as iCalendar
Departmental Colloquium - Kate Kirkpatrick (Oxford)
S0.18

Week 2, 30 April - Kate Kirkpatrick (Oxford): The Myth of Recognition in The Second Sex 

Since Eva Lundgren-Gothlin鈥檚 Sex and Existence and Nancy Bauer鈥檚 Simone de Beauvoir, Philosophy, and Feminism, several philosophical interpreters of The Second Sex have shared the assumption that The Second Sex is Hegelian and that 鈥渢he Hegel question鈥—namely, the debate about whether and to what extent Beauvoir鈥檚 account of woman as the Other is indebted to Hegel鈥檚 Master/Slave dialectic—is best answered by reading Beauvoir through 鈥淔rench Hegel鈥, and especially through the reading of Alexandre Koj猫ve. This paper argues on historical, textual, and conceptual grounds that Beauvoir鈥檚 philosophical and political project in The Second Sex is better characterized as anti-Hegelian, sharing methodological and political commitments with the 鈥渢urn to the concrete鈥 and 鈥淔rench Marx鈥. Moreover, reading Beauvoir as a "French" Hegelian theorist of recognition overlooks her suspicion—a longstanding suspicion in French philosophy—of what she calls the "myth" of recognition itself.

Placeholder

Let us know you agree to cookies