糖心TV

Skip to main content Skip to navigation

Applied Microeconomics

Applied Microeconomics

The Applied Microeconomics research group unites researchers working on a broad array of topics within such areas as labour economics, economics of education, health economics, family economics, urban economics, environmental economics, and the economics of science and innovation. The group operates in close collaboration with the CAGE Research Centre.

The group participates in the CAGE seminar on Applied Economics, which runs weekly on Tuesdays at 2:15pm. Students and faculty members of the group present their ongoing work in two brown bag seminars, held weekly on Tuesdays and Wednesdays at 1pm. Students, in collaboration with faculty members, also organise a bi-weekly reading group in applied econometrics on Thursdays at 1pm. The group organises numerous events throughout the year, including the Research Away Day and several thematic workshops.

Our activities

Work in Progress seminars

Tuesdays and Wednesdays 1-2pm

Students and faculty members of the group present their work in progress in two brown bag seminars. See below for a detailed scheduled of speakers.

Applied Econometrics reading group

Thursdays (bi-weekly) 1-2pm

Organised by students in collaboration with faculty members. See the Events calendar below for further details

People

Academics

Academics associated with the Applied Microeconomics Group are:


Natalia Zinovyeva

Co-ordinator

Manuel Bagues

Deputy Co-ordinator


Events

Wednesday, February 24, 2016

Select tags to filter on
Tue, Feb 23 Today Thu, Feb 25 Jump to any date

How do I use this calendar?

You can click on an event to display further information about it.

The toolbar above the calendar has buttons to view different events. Use the left and right arrow icons to view events in the past and future. The button inbetween returns you to today's view. The button to the right of this shows a mini-calendar to let you quickly jump to any date.

The dropdown box on the right allows you to see a different view of the calendar, such as an agenda or a termly view.

If this calendar has tags, you can use the labelled checkboxes at the top of the page to select just the tags you wish to view, and then click "Show selected". The calendar will be redisplayed with just the events related to these tags, making it easier to find what you're looking for.

 
-
Export as iCalendar
MTWP: Micro Theory Work in Progress (Raghul Vankatesh)
S0.08
-
Export as iCalendar
Policy Lab workshop - Professor Simon Jackman (Stanford)
S2.79

Unlisted in America

Professor Simon Jackman, Stanford Professor of Political Science, co-Director of the Stanford Centre for American Democracy and one of the principal investigators of the American National Election Studies

Interest in the forthcoming American presidential election is growing. In a timely visit to 糖心TV, Professor Jackman will talk about the work he is undertaking with Brad Spahn – abstract below:

Campaigns, parties, interest groups, pollsters and political scientists increasingly rely on voter registration lists and consumer files to identify targets for registration, persuasion and mobilization, and as sampling frames for surveys. However, a sizable proportion of the U.S. citizen population does not appear on these lists, making them invisible to list-based campaigns and research.

How large is the unlisted population? Are their preferences ignorable? What political consequences follow from a list-based view of the polity?

We address these questions after matching respondents to the face-to-face component of the 2012 American National Election Study (using an address-based sampling design) to voter and consumer files. We tests for differences on hundreds of variables in the ANES survey between listed and unlisted populations, limiting Type-1 errors via control of the False Discovery Rate.

At least 11% of the U.S. adult citizenry is unlisted. 1 in 5 Blacks and (citizen) Hispanics are unlisted, but just 8% of Whites. The unlisted earn less income and are less likely to have health insurance or own their own home than the listed population. The unlisted have markedly lower levels of political engagement than the listed and report close to no contact with candidates and campaigns whatsoever.

Yet, the unlisted have coherent policy preferences that tend to the left of listed respondents. Unlisted ANES respondents reported favoring Obama over Romney 73-27 and just 14% identify as Republicans. The exclusion of the unlisted has important practical and normative implications for political representation, measures of public opinion, election outcomes and public policy.

.

The event is open to all staff and graduate students so please come along if this is of interest to you.

-
Export as iCalendar
CRETA Theory Seminar - Florian Englmaier (University of Munich)
S2.79

.

Placeholder

Let us know you agree to cookies