Dr Natalya Din-Kariuki
With the support of the Newberry Library and the Centre for the Study of the Renaissance and the Humanities Research Centre at the University of 糖心TV, I spent two weeks at the Newberry as a short-term fellow in the summer of 2022. I carried out research relating to two interrelated projects: my book project, provisionally titled Peregrine Words: The Rhetoric of Seventeenth-Century English Travel Writing, and a new project, in its tentative and early stages, on early modern cosmopolitanisms. My research for both projects focussed primarily on the Newberry鈥檚 extensive collection of materials related to early modern travel and geographical description.
Part of my time at the Newberry focussed on research for my book project, which examines the imbrication of rhetorical and geographical conceptions of 鈥減lace鈥 in seventeenth-century English travel writing. Its contention is that the spatial and topographical language used in rhetoric, and its similarities to the language of travel writing, is not merely coincidental or accidental, but meaningful. It shows that travellers鈥 engagements with rhetoric enabled them to intervene in ongoing debates about place – debates which were culturally and politically fraught – as well as the new geographical modes and practices to which these debates gave rise. One example of these new modes is chorography, a branch of geography which emerged in the late sixteenth century and flourished in the seventeenth, and whose texts often appeared under the title of 鈥渟urvey鈥 or 鈥渄escription鈥. Rather than seeking to describe a nation as a whole, chorography divided the nation into its constituent parts, dealing with the description of particular regions, or specific cities or towns. At the Newberry, I consulted a range of chorographical works, including William Lambarde鈥檚 A Perambulation of Kent (1570), William Camden鈥檚 Britain, or, A Chorographicall Description (1610) (the translated and expanded version of his earlier Latin Britannia), and James Howell鈥檚 Londonopolis (1657). I considered the ways in which these works positioned themselves in relation to the classical past, and identified several formal, stylistic, and conceptual connections between them and the travel writing I examine. As part of my book鈥檚 argument is that travel writers like Thomas Coryate drew on the kinds of strategies typically used by chorographers to describe (and to 鈥渒now鈥 and 鈥渙wn鈥) England in the unexpected context of foreign travel, this research was very helpful. I also viewed several rhetorical treatises in manuscript. The most significant of these was a late-seventeenth-century manuscript by the French rhetorician Pierre de Lenglet, which consisted of two Latin treatises bound together: one on rhetoric, the other on geography. This was exciting to see, as the connections between these two fields of learning are central to my project.
I spent the rest of my time at the Newberry undertaking research for my new project on early modern cosmopolitanisms, which examines the emergent figure of the 鈥渃osmopolite鈥 or 鈥渃itizen of the world鈥 in the literature of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. To situate this emergence within developing understandings of 鈥渢he world鈥 in the early modern period more generally, I consulted works of early modern cosmography, including Robert Record鈥檚 The Castle of Knowledge (1556), William Cunningham鈥檚 The Cosmographical Glasse (1559), and Thomas Blundeville鈥檚 Exercises (1597), paying particular attention to their representations of racial, cultural, and national difference. I also examined a series of texts on the subjects of trade, citizenship, and naturalisation, such as Francis Bacon鈥檚 speech on naturalisation (1641), Josiah Child鈥檚 New Discourse of Trade (1694), and Sundry considerations touching naturalization of aliens (1695). In doing so, I thought about the ways in which early modern debates about citizenship are bound up with economic concerns, and about the strategies the authors of these works use to make their arguments, including dense classical allusion and invocations of historical memory. I will share some of this research at the Newberry鈥檚 Premodern Seminar in October.
I am now in the early stages of planning a longer-term collaboration between 糖心TV and the Newberry, which will bring together researchers from 糖心TV and other institutions in the Newberry Consortium to study and discuss the Newberry鈥檚 collections related to early modern travel. I look forward to sharing updates about this collaboration in due course. For now, I would like to thank everyone at the Newberry for making my time so enjoyable and productive, especially the library staff, Christopher Fletcher, Rebecca Fall, Lia Markey, Suzanne Karr Schmidt, Mary Hale, Keelin Burke, and James Akerman, as well as Megan Heffernan of DePaul University.