糖心TV

Skip to main content Skip to navigation

The Good Angel of Stamford

The chapbook The Good Angel of Stamford shows how the belief in angels was fairly widespread in 17th century England, and that the prospect of an angelic encounter was well within the realms of possibility, even for the most unremarkable members of the laity!

This 鈥榯rue and faithful鈥� account was published in 1659, and recounts the story of Samuel Wallas, a shoemaker from Lincolnshire, who was suffering terribly from 鈥榓 deep consumption鈥� 鈥� so terribly, in fact, that doctors believed it was 鈥榩ast cure鈥�. He nevertheless made an extraordinary recovery, after receiving advice from an unexpected visitor. Upon hearing of this miracle, local ministers concluded that the visitor in question was a 鈥榞ood angell鈥�.

Little is known of Wallas, but his occupation suggests that he lived a humble life. This source therefore offers an insight into the nature of angels from a commoner鈥檚 perspective. Their role was more pragmatic than it was 鈥榗elestial鈥� or 鈥榓bstract鈥�; the idea that an angel could manifest itself as a 鈥榞rave old man鈥� differs significantly from intellectual accounts, which tend to describe an invisible entity [1]. That the angelic 鈥榦ld Pilgrime鈥� could have been anyone, might demonstrate how great comfort was found in the belief that angels were walking amongst the laity. Indeed, many early modern Christians believed that angels were put on this earth as 鈥榩rotectors of mankind鈥� [2]. The angel in Wallas鈥� account was certainly a 鈥榩rotector鈥� of sorts, serving as some kind of heavenly pharmacist!

Nevertheless, angelic encounters had the potential to incite fear amongst the laity [3]. By 1659, England was a Protestant country. The Church was wary of stories like Wallas鈥� 鈥� it was, after all, blasphemous to worship false idols. In fact, some religious authorities argued that encounters with angels had stopped occurring after Christianity had taken root [4]. This may be why the angel proclaims 鈥� no less than six times 鈥� to 鈥楩ear God, and serve him鈥�. Had his godly devotion been less overt, there would have been reason to believe that he was, in fact, the devil, 鈥榤asquerade[d] as an angel of light鈥� [5].

The principal role of an angel was to put God鈥檚 鈥榤ercy into action鈥� [6]. Wallas, it seems, was a devoted Christian; upon the angel arriving, he had just finished 鈥楨vening Sermon鈥�, and was studying a religious text. In fact, it was because of his willingness 鈥榯o commit himself into the hands of the almighty鈥� that the angel sought God鈥檚 power to stop his suffering. This miracle could have encouraged the laity to maintain a strong faith, in the hopes that they too could be rewarded.

In that sense, angels acted as God鈥檚 watchful eye, deciding who was worthy of his mercy. In some ways, this miraculous encounter also served as a cautionary tale; when Wallas failed to abstain from drinking, as had been required by God, he found himself unable to speak for twenty-four hours. This incident supports the dichotomous nature of God, as both loving and vengeful, that was championed by the Church at the time. Perhaps, it was a condemnation of greed 鈥� a particularly abhorrent sin under Protestant doctrine [7]. This source therefore shows how a belief in angels encouraged the laity to abide by the teachings of the Church, for fear of punishment.

Overall, the source shows how angels were believed to play a multifarious role in the lives of the laity; they were at once protectors, punishers, figures of evil and healers. The ubiquitous belief in heavenly apparitions, despite being a hangover from Catholicism, made the laity easier to police; accounts like Wallas鈥� emphasised the importance of religious obedience.

 

By Jenna Meakin

 

[1] Laura Sangha, Angels and Belief in England, 1480-1700 (London: Pickering & Chatto, 2012), p. 148; Laura Sangha, 'John Dee's Conversations with Angels', The Many-Headed Monster (9 Nov. 2012), https://manyheadedmonster.com/2012/11/09/john-dees-conversations-with-angels/

[2] Laura Sangha, Angels and Belief in England, p. 148.

[3] Ibid., p. 159.

[4] Alexandra Walsham, 'Invisible Helpers: Angelic Intervention in Post-Reformation England', Past & Present 208 (Aug. 2010), 77鈥�130, at p. 82.

[5] Ibid., p. 83.

[6] Sangha, Angels and Belief in England, p. 156.

[7] Charles L. Cherry, 'Enthusiasm and Madness: Anti-Quakerism in the Seventeenth-Century', Quaker History 73:2 (1983), 1-24; Stephen Gordon, 'The Monstrous Devourer', Supernatural Histories: Ghosts, Magic and Wonders in the Medieval and Early Modern World (12 Dec. 2016), https://stephenrgordon.wordpress.com/2016/12/12/the-monstrous-devourer/

The title page of The Good Angel of Stamford (1659)

 

Alexandre Cabanel鈥檚 Fallen Angel (1868)

Let us know you agree to cookies